Kodiak reviews — prijon kayaks | buyers’ guide
I’m kinda new at all this, but I purchased a very used Kodiak and went about re-decking it? All the lines on top. My first trip out on it was in Texas, that’s in the USA for you Euro peoples! The river was a mixture of short rapids and smooth water on a multi day excursion. I packed a lot of gear because it’s better to be prepared than be cold at night and wet/hungry. I have to say, within our group mine was the Ferrari of the lot. The rudder was fantastic, it paddled easy for me, I was able to point wherever and it just went..A couple of strokes and I was back to glide mode, needless to say I wasn’t tired at the end of the day from paddling. I’m 5’8” tall and 195 lbs.
Stability was fine as I had it weighted down pretty much with everything and the kitchen sink.. even still it was a joy to paddle and smooth riding. Yes, I heeled it over and had some fun, the boat responds well to anything you want it to do. So, for a first time kayaker and first kayak I think this is a great excursion kayak, lots of room, fun to paddle, responsive, and easy on the wallet.
My only complaint and this is minor as I’m not sure I’m sitting right, is the seat backrest could be taller? It kept squishing under the back lip. That’s it. Go paddle and have fun!
Outstanding, but not ideal for river rapids.
As a kayaking newbie, I took this canoe on a 7 day, 240km trip down the Tano river in northern Finland.
It’s very stable and easy to paddle in straight lines, and importantly for a wild camping trip, has ample storage. I had a hammock, tarp, sleeping bag, stove, axe, saw, bag of clothes and bags of 3 days of food, and still had room for a couple more bags.
The hatches are also quite watertight with the neoprene covers — even after capsizing in rapids there was only half a cup of water in the hatches.
Which brings me to my last point, having been given these yaks as newbies, we didn’t realise that they are really too long to be good in rapids. We only went on level 1 rapids but turning out of the way of rocks in a fast current is a hard battle, and 3 times I didn’t make it, the tail hit the rock and I got turned sideways and rolled over. Probably if you’re an experienced paddler this wouldn’t happen to you, and if you’re not crossing any rapids it’s irrelevant.
The other point is that as a 6 foot 1 man I have been in very tight and uncomfortable kayaks before, but this one is incredibly roomy. I had the foot pegs 9 holes from the end and they still had another 3 or 4 adjustment holes to go. Yes I did get uncomfortable after about 3-4 hours of paddling but I expect that’s normal. The seat back is well made and comfortable, although I had to knot the cord to stop the seat back slipping backwards and the gripping device on the cord wasn’t up to it.
great yak.
Finally..broke down and bought something iv’e been wanting for a long time, a prijon kodiak! My previous bought was also a prijon,an Invader,old school river runner,tough,maneuverable and fun,but not good for long flatwater trips.Back to the Kodiak,initial stability could be called tender,although not overly so.Secondary stability is solid..never felt like i was going to tip over.Speed is great,this boat can move as long as the engine has enough horsepower!Turning takes a little effort,but put her on edge and it’s doable.Gear capacity,how much do you want to carry? I’m pretty much a light traveler/fisherman,but there’s as much or more room for just about anything you want to carry.Do not have a rudder on this boat,nor can i foresee getting one.great glide when you stop paddling and very easy to paddle.Exactly what i was looking for.Thanks to the folks at Puddledockers,Ithaca ny for selling me what i wanted.
Kayakers, please take note ,the Prijon Kodiak is a watercraft in a class all by itself. A unique manufacturing process called blown molding,using a superior material called HTP ,creates a boat that is virtually indestructible. Are you adventurous, then we both know storage will one day be an issue. When it comes to that ,this baby is a monster! Let’s talk performance, stability, primary, and secondary, watershed, tracking, and speed are the best they can be. Don’t take my word for it, please google search some kayaking world travelers, Jon Turk, Renata Chlumska, and my favorite Christian Donoso,you will be amazed. These people only use the PRIJON KODIAK !!! Let the Kodiak be your vessel for all your journeys atop life’s currents and I promise you she will only deliver you to safe harbors.
Had to spend the day in this boat (rental) and as you can guess from my rating, I didn’t exactly dig it. It gets a ‘5’ (which is average in my book, not a slam) only because it probably works fine in its niche.
Here are positives and negatives, with what I didn’t like first:
Negatives:
– Pretty low initial stability.
By no means the worst I’ve encountered (something like the Current Designs Scirocco is considerably worse on this), but low enough to be very annoying. Nor is it a case of ‘yeah, it’s twitchy, but you’ll get used to it in no time’… more like, you’ll put up with it and it’ll feel a little bit less twitchy after awhile, but still pretty darn twitchy. This was surprising to me considering the Kodiak’s width, which is a reasonable 23″. My guess is that the hull is pretty rounded, a la something like the Nordkapp. Whatever they did, the boat doesn’t let you fully relax, ever, which is a bummer. Not confidence-inspiring.
— Manueverability.
Uhh… there is none. The Kodiak turns like a tank, especially without rudder, and even the rudder is a bit undersized/not up to the task. I went mostly w/out rudder because I wanted a challenge, and boy oh boy, did I ever get one. Only way to turn this beast was with front and rear sweep strokes, and a whole lotta brute muscle… and even then, the turns were wide. Maybe if I edged hard it’d be a bit better, but the low stability makes you not want to try that too much.
— Main hatches.
These are fussy affairs with dual belts and buckles and a sprayskirt-like liner underneath. Quite cumbersome and slow, you really wish they’d gone for KayakSport or Valley-type ‘tupperware’ hatches instead.
— Deck hatch.
This is a small screw-top hatch placed right in front of the cockpit. You think it’s convenient and neat, until you realize that it isn’t waterproof.
— Deck rigging.
Would rather have deck lines than the front and rear nets… they just feel more secure.
At this point, I almost have to wonder if Prijon is being ‘different just to be different’ in order to differentiate itself from other kayak manufacturers.
Positives:
— It does fit large paddlers pretty well.
I’m a fairly big boy and it felt plenty roomy to me, and had enough room for my feet (size 10s) which, shockingly, even some fairly big boats don’t always (the Etain RM 17-5 for example).
— TONS of cargo room. It is an expedition boat, for sure.
— Handles small waves well.
This is the plus side of the poor initial stability… the rounded hull shrugs off small waves pretty well. However, I wouldn’t want to deal with large waves in this thing, because I prefer a more stable platform to brace from than the Kodiak provides. With the Kodiak, you’re not sure where the tipping point is, so you don’t feel confident leaning hard into a wave and bracing.
-Speed
The Kodiak has above average speed (probably due to its length and low rocker). It’s no super-speedster, but it’ll get up and go.
Overall, I’d say the Kodiak might make a decent loaded expedition boat (it’s probably more stable with a bunch of ballast weight sitting down low) for large paddlers who are of the mindset that they’re willing to learn the boat’s quirks and put up with them.
But as a day boat (i.e. ‘get in and go’), it would be pretty unwieldy/sub-par for most anybody, and I do think it suffers from a big dose of ‘being different just to be different’ syndrome.
I hear that Prijon doesn’t make this boat anymore, and it’s probably just as well as even large paddlers who are expedition-focused can likely find better options out there. But to those out there who might buy one used or rent one, well, you’ve been warned.
I have had my Kodiak for 6 months and have paddle it under a variety of mostly calm conditions. I’m 6’3″ and 200 lbs, with size 12 feet, and the Kodiak fits me like a glove.
- Positives:
- I think it is well laid out. I’ve come to really like the day hatch ahead of the cockpit, but as others have mentioned, it is not waterproof. Unlike one other commenter, I have no trouble reaching the cargo netting that’s forward of the day hatch.
- The storage space really is cavernous, and this is one of the reasons I chose the Kodiak. However, someone that doesn’t over-pack would not need this kind of space unless out for more than a week.
- The hatch covers, though somewhat unwieldy, are very dry and secure.
- I like the fairly stiff plastic. It will dent if you crank down on the car-top carrier straps, but less so that most other boats.
- If you want a rudder, and I do, then the pivoting pedals are the only way to go. They give you the support of fixed pegs. I don’t find the hardware arrangement to be a problem.
Negatives:
- This boat is a beast to maneuver. With little rake in the bow and zero rocker, you will not finesse it through turns, by edging or otherwise. Time and/or brute strength is required.
- Given the difficulty in maneuvering, the balanced rudder that is often sold for this boat does not have enough surface area. It’s OK for counteracting weathercocking- which is all I really use it for, but it quickly stalls if turned more than a few degrees.
Overall, I like this boat and it works well for someone my size (or larger!) in open water where a lot of maneuvering is not required. It should make a great expedition boat and has been use as such in some publicized trips. If you are of average or smaller size and don’t need to carry weeks of supplies, or if you favor small rivers and creeks, you could make a better choice.
Ignore the 10 at the bottom of this review — it doesn’t mean much. Here are some numbers that might be more useful: I am 6’1″, 165 lbs, shoe size 10, 12 years paddling experience on Georgia Strait, BC. I’ve had the Kodiak for a year and put a couple hundred nautical miles on it, mostly day trips but also a 9 day trip.
The Kodiak is a big, fast gear hauler, suitable for going from point A to B. It is not playful, but it handles loads and rough water well. It is rudder dependent in wind. The rudder pegs are the gas-pedal type and work well. The neo plastic hatch covers are very water-tight and absolutely cavernous: lots of room to swallow gear. The boat rolls fine if you pad out the cockpit with foam.
Conclusion: if you are looking for a big tripping boat to cover long distances under load, the Kodiak should be on your list. If you want such a boat in quality plastic, then the Kodiak should be near the top of your list.
I just bought a new Prijon Kodiak with rudder, and although I have not paddled it yet, I already have some gripes. On a positive note, it is a beauty, nice lines and shape, the mango is…..yellow, looks to have plenty of cargo space, and the hatches are HUGE. The Prijon plastic is all it is touted to be. I am sure there will be more positives after I paddle.
So, now the seemingly not so good. I will start with the mini hatch in front of the cockpit, which by the way, according to Prijon, is not water tight. Why? Who Knows. Yeah, why would you put a hatch in a spot that potentially gets mass water, and not make it water tight? The positioning of the mini hatch is ridiculous. It is placed out in front of you about as far as the average human can reach, right where your deck bag SHOULD go, if you carry one. Because of this hatch, your deck bag/boat tie down connections don’t even start till forward of this hatch, which is, as stated, now beyond normal reach. As if the hatch takes the place of a watertight deck bag. I suppose I can add some worm gear aft of the hatch on the sides, but then my deck bag will sit on top of the hatch cover, which is bulky and raises off of the deck. Just not smart.
People have seemed to like the «gas pedal» style rudder pedals. I think they are a poor design. I like the KISS principle, pedal, cable, rudder. The Prijon design has too many moving parts and adds strap and cable situated around your feet where it is already busy. When my feet are situated where I want them, heels on the floor of the cockpit, the fulcrum point for the pedal is above the ball of my feet, and I wear a size 11. This means you have to actually lift your foot a bit to push and activate the rudder. Not a huge deal, but not to ergo either. Also, with this design you almost have to push the pedal straight on, like the gas pedal in your car. This is difficult because of the angle that your feet meet the pedal, coming from the thigh braces. I adjusted till I was blue and still could not get it comfortable. You have to pull a knob to adjust the pedal position, then pull a strap to adjust the pedal angle. The strap is attached to the upper outside of the pedal, which as stated, makes it too busy by the feet. Why so many moving parts just to steer a kayak? Who knows.
The seat is ok. I don’t care for how it adjusts, if it slips off its track, it can be cumbersome to re-attach. Again, not huge, but a little tic that in my humble opinion, does not need to be. The hatch covers seem sturdy and well made. They fit tight and conform well to the shape of the boat once tightened. Prijon uses a plastic clip to restrain the excess strap after tightening. This clip is poorly designed and has no place on a expedition sea kayak. The clip actually falls off the strap when moved aggressively and it WILL break or be lost your first trip out. I know I know, not huge, but why even put it there?!
I returned a new Necky Looksha 17 before buying this boat. It was more comfortable in the cockpit, but the design flaws were so glaring that I could not imagine keeping it. That might be another review. Living in Las Vegas does not make it easy to buy a kayak. I just go off of reviews and others experiences and hope for the best. I am hoping the paddling experience in this boat is so good that it trumps the bad…I’ll let ya know.
I picked up a Kodiak a couple months ago. I had previously owned a Dagger Magellan 16.5, but found it a little too confining for my feet when using the rudder pedals. I have no such problem with the Kodiak. It’s larger, but doesn’t feel or handle like a big boat. It’s stable, but not a barge. The gas-pedal type foot braces are amazing. All boats should adopt them. The bungee nets on the decks are handier than I thought they would be. With only two 1/4″ neo pads (one for each butt cheek), the stock seat bottom is very comfy. I didn’t care for the Prijon seat back and that’s the only reason I didn’t give the Kodiak a 10 rating. I replaced it with the best back band around, an IR Reggie.
One of my kayaking buddies calls it the Hummer of kayaks. It’s big, it’s tough, it’s not as elegant looking as a composite sea kayak and it can carry a ton. The plastic Prijon uses is incredible. It can take any abuse a paddler could dish out. The plastic has a matte finish that takes some getting used to. I had intended to upgrade to a glass or kevlar boat, but my finances didn’t allow it. I am glad I decided on the Prijon. The composite boats may be cooler looking and lighter, but when the going gets tough (and rocky), they can’t compete.
I would recommend the Kodiak to any skill level paddler and whatever you do, get the rudder.
I purchased a Kodiak in February 09. My wife and I rented and paddled several recreational boats and really enjoyed the sport. We wanted to move up to true sea kayaks, but were (and are) novices. It’s a little hard to try a dozen different boats here in the middle of Texas. It’s also difficult to rent anything over 14′. I originally wanted the «do everything» boat…Rivers, Ocean, Lakes, mild rapids, fishing… I finally narrowed it down to somewhere between 15-17 feet in length. I tried a Current Designs Gulfstream, An Eddyline Equinox (very early on because someone recommended it), a Necky Chatham 16 (Poly)and a Valley (Poly). My wife also tried a few (She ended up with a used, glass Wilderness Systems Tempest and loves it!)
After tons of research I decided on the Prijon Kodiak and the Necky Chathem 17. I am 6’0 and 220 lbs. Size 11 feet. I am hard on gear and usually test the limits as far as durability. My requirement’s were…
a) Durability
b) Maneuverability
c) Cargo
d) Versatility
e) Price (we had to buy 2 boats)
f) performance/speed
g) looks
I bought the Prijon over the Necky simply because I hadn’t had the opportunity to sit in, touch or feel a new Chatham 17 and the 16 didn’t fit well. The Prijon also seemed significantly more rugged.
I couldn’t be happier with my choice. Every time I paddle I think that I have the perfect boat. It was a little «tippy» at first but that was gone in about the first 20 minutes of the first 3 trips. I played in our pool with it and it’s much more stable that it seems. I highly recommend testing the limits early on if you’re a newbie like me. It gave me tons of confidence. The only reason I didn’t give it a 10 is that I haven’t paddled everything out there and I probably wouldn’t give anything a 10 anyway. I can’t think of one single thing that I would change. I’ve practiced rolling it (unsuccessful in our pool but, I’m new to the sport and I have never had any rolling training. It was a whim one day. I was very close to being successful. With a rolling lesson or two, I think I have it. It’s certainly not the boat’s fault). I love this boat and I was worried about buyer’s remorse. No remorse at all. I can’t recommend the Kodiak highly enough. Customer service from Prijon was also very attentive when I contacted for info re: Kodiak before purchase.
I hope this review helps someone as much the previous reviewers helped me. Especially if you can’t try a ton of boats.
Okay… I’ve read all the reviews on the Kodiak, and I must agree with the majority. As is typical, being a large 6′-1″ 250lb., I searched the internet and paddling shops until I settled on a mighty Yak that could carry me comfortably along with a good amount of gear for camping. I’m a novice paddler who didn’t want to buy an intermediate kayak, only to out grow it’s skill level within a season. So I did a bunch of research and settled on the Kodiak. I’m sure glad that I did!
The good — It’s a durable Kayak with a type of air induced plastic manufacturing that creates a stiffer and more durable kayak. It doesn’t scrape or scratch half as much as my wife’s Venture Easky 15. It’s a heavy kayak, being about 66lbs. This seams to help in the water, allowing for better secondary stability. In fact, when paddling into the wind or through some choppy water, this yak seems to hunker down and carry you through like a champ! It’s a fast boat for such a big kayak, and I can out-paddle just about everyone on the lake except for the racing kayakers.
The bad — Primary stability was a little less than I had expected. In truth, I tipped the yak in 6 inches of water on my maiden voyage when trying to shove off a low grade boat ramp in a dry entry (darn bow hung on the ramp). I’ll admit that I was a fool, not to mention being a novice. Wet entries are much better for me. Also, it took a while to understand what a tri-hydral hull handled like. It was different than the Easky 15 and the Necky Zoar I had tried. You can lean this kayak a bit more than you would think, and when I finally get a rudder, I think I’ll even learn to edge it through turns.
Overall, I’d give it a 10! I love this yak! Its got great storage space. Its got a very comfortable seat and thigh braces that are fully adjustable as well. You can’t go wrong with this one!
The Kodiak is my first sea kayak, and I shopped around a lot to find a boat that would fit my requirements. I needed a tough boat that I could truck around myself, I needed a boat that could be used for day touring and longer trips, and the Kodiak seemed to fit the bill. It did, and I absolutely love it. I use it mainly for day trips in various types of waters, and it handles extremely well in all the conditions where I have tried it. I am still trying to learn to turn the boat by leaning over and I am gaining confidence every time.
The only problem I have found is that the rudder release system, which is made up of a line with two plastic spheres and a hook for attaching the line at the side of the paddler, sometimes falls off when you pull to drop the rudder. I have had the release line drag behind me in the water for the entire duration of the trip, picking up kelp and stuff. This is a minor nuisance and I have learned to be more careful when dropping the rudder.
The speed is good, and I have recently had the opportunity to test it — I fell in with a group of paddlers going full tilt in their sleek touring kayaks and their huge, shovel-like wing paddles. I wasn’t quite able to keep up with them, but almost…
A few months ago I purchased a Prijon Kodiak for myself and a Prijon Seayak for my wife. We have been paddling for 3 years and have used Prijon Combi’s on rivers and in the ocean. Decided it was time to get real sea kayaks.
I am 6’3″, 225lbs, size 14 feet. The Kodiak has more that enough room. I do not have to have the seat all the way back and the foot pegs are still not all the way forward. I test paddled and looked at as many boats as I could and finally settled on the P&H Capella 173 with a skeg. In the end I did not want to spend $6,000 for 2 Capellas and instead took a hard look at the Prijons. I am really glad I did.
I kept hearing about the light weight and speed of fiberglass vs plastic. But the 17′ Kodiak weighs only 4 lbs more that the 17″ Capella. Also, the Prijon’s blow mold process produces a very stiff plastic boat. With the Prijons I don’t have to worry about dragging them over rocks on shore. They will stand up to anything. They are beatutiful, very durable, high quality boats at half the price of fiberglass.
I originally was looking for a skeg, but the Prijon balance rudders are much more versatile in all conditions. We have been out in 20 Knot winds with 4′ seas and these boats handle beautifully.
Anyone considering a sea kayak should definitely take a look at the Prijons. Depending on size and what you want do with it, either the Touryak, Seayak or Kodiak should be on a short list.
Price — $1725.00 (w/rudder)- Kind of high esp. for plastic.
Stability- Excellent primary / Good secondary.
Speed- Excellent/ Tested with a G.P.S. (unloaded). -Against a stiff wind and 1-2 ft waves, I averaged a steady speed of 6.1 mph. On flat water managed to exceed a speed of 8.0 mph.
Turning- Excellent/ (Without the use of the rudder). Once you learn to «lean» on the tri-hull design along with 3-4 well placed paddle strokes, it is surprisingly easy to turn this 17′ beast.
Tracking- Excellent/ Even without the use of the rudder.
Rudder- (Wildwasser Balanced Wing Rudder)/ Great- Minimal drag, efficient foot pedal control, turns kayak well. (Rudder design is very much improved over previous designs).
Storage- Excellent/ This boat has plenty, front and rear bulk hatches (w/ neoprene covers), and cargo nets. -also added was a water tight neoprene day hatch in front of the cockpit.
Durability- Excellent/ The blowmolded HTP plastic is stiffer than most other plastic boats and will take quite a bit of abuse before it is severely damaged.
Quality — Excellent/ For a plastic boat, this is the top-of-the-line plastic boat. Also a lot of detail went into the rigging on this boat as well.
Weight- 62lbs./ Fair- Not the best boat to have to carry around either unloaded or loaded. Highly recommend a kayak cart with this beast.
Comfort- Excellent/ This boat is designed for bigger paddlers. If you are around 6′ and 180lbs. This is a great boat for you. Everything on this boat is adjustable. Seat, seat back, thigh pads, pedals… -A very comfortable ride!
The bad- Size/ Remember, this boat is a beast, 17′ and 62lbs. This boat was designed for long trips and to be loaded with a lot of gear. This is not a boat that I would recommend to someone just to take out for a day paddle or to use as a «light
touring» kayak. This is an expedition kayak.
The ugly- The size and weight of the Kodiak combined make this a hard boat to store and transport as I quickly found out. The heat especially is bad for this boat as if it is not evenly distributed, will warp or dent severely either on its side or when setting flat. The only good thing is that if this happens, applying heat with a heat gun or a hair dryer will «pop» the dents out and the plastic will return to its original form as plastics have a «memory».
Bottom Line- An excellent expedition kayak especially for the bigger paddlers. The quality is top notched and a high level of detail went into this boat at all levels. The Kodiak by Prijon has set the benchmark for plastic kayaks and will be a classic boat for a long time….
The first time I ever paddled this boat I howled and then took out my credit card. It was and remains the best boat I have ever paddled. It is stable, fast, manuverable, tough, comfortable, and has good storage and looks great too.
Stability- standing still you have a tippy feeling beacause it moves from the center stability position to the side stability position so easily, but once you get a feel for that it is quite stable. When moving it feels very stable and once you get used to leaning it into its side positions you can turn smoothly and rather nimbley for such a long and great tracking boat.
Fast- a great top speed. Gentle strokes give an easy 4-5 knots and a good hard paddle gives about 7 or so sustainably for me. Very efficient and quiet on the water. This boat likes speed.
Manuverable- I have not yet put on a rudder and while I had planned to add it quickly last year, I found I really didn’ need it. This boat has rapidly become a mindless extension of my body so I really don’t have to think about turning, it just moves with me. Very nice in a long boat!
Tough- the platic is very rigid. I have managed to scratch it from rocks and dragging but it is a very durable and much stiffer than normal plastic boats.
Comfortable- the padded seats are very comfortable for long trips, there is enough room in the cockpit for you to move your legs around and strech out a bit.
Storage- the storage is very good! Big compartments that seem tight fore and aft and a handy easy access watertight compartment right in fromt. Bungee nets on top. Nice appointments on boat.
Looks great- I saw one once on the water and was impressed. Now I am doing that to people. It is a cool looking boat, I have had a number of other paddlers single me out of a group of boats to complement. (Not me I think, just my boat, but still, it feels good!)
This is a good a boat as you are likely to ever need. I give it a solid 10!
I have many composite and plastic kayaks over several years,I rate the kodiak the best overall because of its build quality,»strength» excellent tracking comfort and speed,I also paddle a kevlar multisport kayak and have gps etc,The kodiak has excellent speed,9.5 kms no problems for hrs,It is a great point to point kayak,Yet to try surfing it in a decent sea swell,A little more expensive than some others but I feel you get what you pay for,The kodiak replaces a composite sea kayak,,Yes its that good.
This summer I purchased a ’06 Prion Kodiak from my local dealer here in Kalispell. Rocky Mtn. Outfitter. Great people. I am 5’9″ and around 240lbs. I just love this boat! Everything just suits me to a tee. Stable, fast, workmanship, and a massive amount of storage. Due to a bad knee, I really appreciate the key hole style cockpit, it’s much easier to get both in and out of. The process of Prijons blow-molding vs typical roto-molding make for a very rigid boat. You will spend more money up front for a Prijon product, but it’s money well spent. My 12 yr. old son Jake and I spend most of our time on the many lakes offered here in the Flathead Valley. His boat is my old ’04 WS Cape Horn 150 (Plastic). I have been paddling now for around 10yrs. In that time I have owned Dagger, Perception, Wilderness Systems, and now Prijon. So I feel that my appraisal is both fair and honest. Simply said, Prijon is just a superior product. If you are in the market for a new boat and a «bigger» guy or gal for that matter, take the time to check the kodiak out. I think that you will be happy that you did!
The Prijon Kodiak is the flagship model of the Prijon line, and it is a superb boat with many virtues and few vices. Made for a larger paddler, I am 5 foot 8.5 inches and weight 168 lbs, and I feel very comfortable in this ‘pit, although I have added some minicell under the thigh braces. Please note that I own the 2004 model, produced before the 2006 remodel. Like all Prijons, the workmanship is truly superior for a plastic boat (blow mold, not rotomolded), and the dry hatches, coaming, and deck lines are well thought out. My version does not have paddle rescue deck lines. The seat, although not as comfortable as a rec kayak seat for those that like a reclining paddle position, is made for superior upright sitting in order to optimize the paddling stroke efficiency. When the padded seat back (a vast benefit over many yak’s backbands, in my opinion) is upright and secured, the positioning of the lumbar spine and buttocks is perfect for a strong stroke. Some minicell can be added to the seat pad, and I find it better than the stock Prijon removable seat pad. I cannot comment on the seta back being too high to roll as I am not a roller.
The performance of the Kodiak is stellar, and in wind-whipped chop it seems to stay steady and straight thanks to the 17 foot one inch length. This length compensates for the weathercocking that is famous for shorter Prijon models. I have no rudder, and find that the boat seems to edge well; I have not yet been in conditions that warrant a rudder, although I am a rudder advocate when necessary. This boat appears to do well without.
The Kodiak’s speed is better than fair, but it is with a 24 inch beam. It is, by reviews I have read, the second fastest Prijon. It would likely not be as fast as a 21-22 inch sea kayak, and if shear speed is the goal, try the Prijon Barracuda (see my review on that boat). If longer treks, distance paddling, especially if on stumpy, icy or rocky waters, the Prijon Kodiak rules over fiberglass and Kevlar. If one were paddling in debris-clear water, a very long distance, on low to middling chop, another 21-22 inch yak would likely get you from point to point quicker. The Barracuda should be considered in those cases, esp. as it can handle some abuse.
In summary, the Kodiak is a workhorse of a sea kayak, favored by expedition kayakers like Renata Chlumska and Jon Turek. It holds loads of gear (but not startlingly more than the Prijon Barracuda). Please note that, although I am below the height and size that is generally thought of for the “big man’s boat” Kodiak, I feel perfectly confident and comfortable in this 2004 model year boat. It paddles like a charm, has high initial and secondary stability. It has a generous cockpit opening that allows great leg stretch, and requires an XL Wildwasser or Snapdragon sprayskirt. The boat performs well with a 220 cm or 230 cm paddle length. The quality control at Prijon is exceptional.
I have owned my Kodiak for five seasons and have paddled it off the Oregon Coast, Puget Sound, the San Juan Islands, and the Columbia River. It is the fourth kayak I have owned. I should start by saying that my feelings about this boat are very complicated, and only now, as I have only just purchased a Valley Pintail for my primary boat, do I feel that I can give it a fair evaluation.
As others have noted the Kodiak is a fast kayak with a great deal of storage that really loves rough water. I’ve had my boat in 5-6 foot surf and it broached only slightly. It weathercocks slightly, but only in the heaviest winds. With the rudder down, it is unmovable. It slides effortlessly over the face of almost any wave. In confused water, when other boats tend to bob, the Kodiak cuts right through, as if it is unconcerned with either chop or current.
While it is a bit on the heavy side, the boat has been very durable and has been used two to three times a week for over four years, and even more often in the summer. The hatches are cavernous almost 10000 cubes and the boat gains a great deal of initial and final stability as the weight sinks it into the water. The boat is easy to maneuver for a boat its length, and can be held on edge, while standing still, quite easily.
On the down side- I have had trouble with the thigh braces and after trying to fabricate my own, eventually ordered a set of customized replacements from Prijion (this has only become available this year, at a low cost). I have talked to many other Prijion owners who have had problems with the hard, brick-like braces. I also replaced the backband, as the original was little more than a piece of Styrofoam covered in fabric. I have resealed the bulkheads and they stay relatively dry save a few tablespoons of water but the old-style plastic hatch covers have both been replaced as they broke quite easily. The new ones are much better.
The buckles have also been replaced several times. I have also had to replace the deck nets every other season as they loose their elasticity.
One benefit I was especially interested in was the ability to repair the plastic. This promise, however, has proved to be disappointing. After purchasing half a dozen different consumer and commercial glue guns, and two soldering irons, I can safely say that using the repair sticks is minimally effective and does actually bond with the plastic to make one cohesive piece. The repairs fall out quite readily and are difficult to shape. The rudder lines also cut your legs if you are not careful, although it does not require the rudder very frequently.
Prijion customer service has been excellent. I can say they have been more prompt and courteous than any other customer service department, regardless of product or field, than any other I have ever dealt with. Ever problem I have encountered has been quickly responded to and successfully addressed. For this alone, I will probably purchase additional Prijion boats in the future.
Overall, while not a novice’s boat, this boat is comfortable.
I bought this boat without trying it first (a long story involving a large discount), and I am genuinely very pleased with it. However, whilst I concur with the general praise offerred here, I do have three important reservations (hence only a 7 out of 10), which I shall list in ascending order of concern:
Firstly, I bought the rudderless version, as I am new to paddling sea kayaks and wanted to learn how to handle one without a rudder. However I would have liked the option of a retractable skeg as an alternative, for those rear quartering sea days and longer journeys.
Secondly, I am a bit of a fanatic about rolling — and I mean not just a flat water roll but being able to roll any boat I paddle in heavy seas or surf. To me this is an essential kayaking skill, though I know not everyone agrees. I found that the thight braces in the Kodiak were inadequate in this respect, so that whilst the boat rolled well in calm seas, or even facing into the waves, it was too easy to get twisted out if you tried to roll in surf or a beam sea. I have replaced the rather small side braces with proper thigh braces from a white water boat and am pleased to report that it now rolls a charm in the above conditons, and now I can just focus on my set up and sweep, without worrying about being rocked or twisted out of position, and be confident that I can get myself the right way up again should I ever need to.
Thirdly, I found the tow lines fore and aft top be a real hazard as, unbekownst to me, the rear one worked loose whilst I was paddling recently and when I treid a practice roll I discovered that my paddle had gone through the post capsize free floating looped end and pulled it tight, preventing me from completing my sweep, and having to try and free the paddle underwater. I’m glad I discovered that one in shallow waters during a practice and not in deep waters when I might have really needed my roll! It may have been a freak accident, but I have erred on the side of caution and removed the tow lines. I can live without being able to tie the kayak up using them, but can’t live with the thought that this could happen when I least need it to.
So, great boat, I would recommend it, but if you’re anything like me you may need to do a bit of customisation to bring your boat up to the highest sea kayak standards.
I just bought a Prijon Kodiak this past weekend; my prior sea kayak was a Aquaterra Scimitar. I looked at the Necky Looksha IV, CD Storm, and the CD Sirocco. My favorite place to paddle is the Texas Gulf Coast, where there is almost always a strong onshore breeze, so I was looking for a kayak that would pose little wind resistance and track straight as a rail. I’m 5’11», 210 lbs, and the Necky was just a little too tight for me, and the amount of rocker aided maneuverability, but at the cost of tracking. The CD Storm seemed okay, but the hull was a bit too flimsy. I liked the Sirocco until I saw one at my local paddle shop that was returned due to a broken seat. The high, sweeping bow also looked like it would act as a sail in beam winds. The Kodiak fits me very well, the hull material is strong, there’s ample storage, and there’s a lot of «niceties» thrown in. Mooring lines fore and aft, full perimeter lines, a hex key stored in the cockpit to adjust the seat and thigh braces, and the gas pedal foot braces are awesome. When I first took the Kodiak out it was a little tippy, but it just took some time to get used to. The first day was on a local lake with a lot of power boats (too many in fact), so I didn’t really get a chance to paddle up to speed. The following day I went to another lake which doesn’t allow power boats (yeah!). The Kodiak is FAST for a plastic boat. My brother has a Perception Captiva, and I was able to put a lot of distance between us very quickly. The Kodiak also tracks extremely well, I bought mine with a rudder and have yet to use it. Although it tracks very well, it’s also quite maneuverable with a good sweep stroke and lean, but, you REALLY have to lean it to make a quick, smooth, tight turn. If you’re looking for a touring «play boat», the Kodiak isn’t for you. If you’re looking for a solid, comfortable, well appointed sea kayak that you can put some serious miles on (without a lot of course corrections), the Kodiak is your boat. As for aesthetics, I like the looks of the Kodiak, but aesthetics are a matter of opinion and really shouldn’t matter unless you want something that will look good on your roof rack. Aesthetics won’t make you go faster, keep you safe and comfortable, nor will keep your hull from oil canning (blow molding ROCKS!). Also, the deck pack nets work very well. I didn’t have to worry about losing my water bottle or bilge pump when I practiced wet exits.
If you’re serious about paddling, don’t base your purchase off looks, base if off functionality, comfort, and features. There’s no other plastic Kayak out there that has the features of the Kodiak, but again, if you’re looking for a touring «play boat» look elsewhere.
I own a kodiak and several other models and think extreamly high of this boat. I read anouther reviewers comments and was displeased. I believe prions boats are not the most pleasing to the eye, and if all you want is a boat that looks good in the garage, dont buy the kodiak, but if you are looking for a boat that you will not grow out of, and that has the performance that compares to a composite, then the kodiak is for you, if it fits you. The material, though its not very pleasing to the eye, is the most durable of any and is as stiff as a composite. As for the deck rigging, i thought it looked bad at first, but the nets are very usefull, they will hold many things that bunjee cord will not. They did not make this boat for stability, but give the boat a couple of hours and you will get used to it. Once you learn to edge a boat, you will love the kodiak.
So, if you are looking for the most durable, longest lasting and a super performing kayak that you will not have to upgrade in a couple of months and you are willing to take a couple of hours to learn how to kayak, get the kodiak(if you can fit, if not go on a diet). If you are into your into kayaking because it is the latest fad and looking for a kayak that looks good to your friends as it hangs in the garage, get into anouther sport.
The Kodiak, by Prijon, is a 17’1″ expedition-class touring kayak. It is an excellent combination of configuration, performance, and reliability. Possibly the most outstanding feature of the Kodiak is the construction. Prijon’s HTP «blow-molded» construction combines the strength of fiberglass with the durability of a plastic kayak. This is one tough boat!
Prijon’s touring boats are also very accommodating. Considering its size this kayak is rather light at 58lbs. The Kodiak is equipped with an adjustable seat and thigh braces. A great feature for getting proper fit and function out of the kayak and especially a nice feature if more than one person uses the kayak. The gas-pedal type foot braces are a very nice touch and are extremely comfortable to use with or without the rudder. Prijon has one of the best rudder systems on the market. The optional rudder is easily deployed and control is both effective and comfortable via the pedal system. You can’t beat it! The rudder system is simple but practical, and I installed it myself with no experience, just the directions, in a little less than an hour.
Other useful amenities are the recessed deck-fittings, deck pack nets, a safety deck line, and fore and aft «tow-lines», or mooring, lines. The Kodiak provides ample storage for multi-day trips. The hatches are a combination neoprene cover with a hard plastic shell covering the hatch. The web straps hold well, even under intense conditions, and so far I have not had any water leak into the hatch. And I’ve been in some intense conditions. One feature that Prijon does not advertise well is the mooring lines. The lines are secured to the deck but can be easily released. They come in handy for two reasons. One, when you’re in shallow water you can easily disengage the lines and pull the kayak along. A very practical advantage! Two, if you pull up to a dock you can easily secure the kayak.
While I find the deck netting very effective, some people are not crazy about it. The netting in front of the cockpit is a little far forward and some paddlers might not like that. I’ve considered placing some extra shock-cord a little closer to the cockpit. The back brace has received some criticism, but I’ve found it very practical. It provides excellent comfort on extended trips. Some criticize the overall design and colors, but Prijon maintains its own unique style and design. And it’s a style and design that definitely performs.
Whether is the fish-form design, the trihedral hull, or the Kodiak’s contours, this kayak is a true performer. The Kodiak cuts through the water like a glass or Kevlar boat. And it’s fast! It accelerates quickly and maintains speed with little effort. In heavy boat wakes, chop, and fetch, the Kodiak handles extremely well. The fish-form design allows for very specific boat control in regard to edging and bracing in extreme conditions. The trihedral design allows for a smooth transition from initial to secondary stability. The Kodiak does not have an upturned «Greenland» bow like the Sea Yak, but it does quickly shed water from the deck and efficiently cuts through waves. I’ve had this kayak out in a variety of places and conditions, from wide rivers, large lakes, marshlands, open bays, and even in the turbulent Atlantic Ocean in windy conditions. The Kodiak met my expectations in every condition. As an intermediate kayaker I felt very comfortable even in very rough conditions with the Kodiak. And I feel this kayak will serve me well as I advance my skills. The only thing I haven’t done with the Kodiak is a roll, but that’s more because of my lack of skill rather than a fault of the kayak (I keep lifting my head up). With proper outfitting and skill, this kayak can be rolled. The one relevant issue people have with the Kodiak is turning. It should be mentioned that this kayak was designed specifically to track well. And it does track well. It takes some serious gusts of wind to weathercock the Kodiak. The Kodiak will make efficient, sharp turns if you combine good sweep strokes with slight edging.
This kayak is ideal for a larger paddler. I’m 6’1″, 250lbs. I’ve modified the cockpit with closed cell foam to increase comfort and paddling efficiency, but otherwise I required no special modification to the kayak’s design. After test paddling several models, I chose the Kodiak and have enjoyed it ever since. I’m giving the Kodiak a 9, but only because of my limited experience rather than because the Kodiak’s excellent performance.
I know this is running contrary to the conclusions of some VERY qualified reviewers, but for some very good reasons. First, it didn’t fit me. Nothing they could do made the thigh braces anywhere near acceptable. Second, though I’m an accomplished canoeist, I’m new to kayaking, which requires a different skill set. I do NOT have a good snap, nor am I very good yet at putting a boat on edge. This boat demands those skills more than any other boat I paddled. I would grow into it, yes, but I need a boat I can enjoy to some extent in the meanwhile, and this wasn’t it. Since the boat I paddled had no rudder, I didn’t have one to fall back upon when I got tired of just working to develop my skills.
Then there’s the fit and finish. For my money, I want a boat that not only paddles well but also is aesthetically pleasing. To MY taste, Kodiak was not. The matte finish was not appealing to me. The boat I paddled was multi-colored, and looked a little as though it was unintentionally so. She was NOT graceful looking. The deck rigging can only be described as cheesy. Now I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but it just didn’t do it for me.
I’ve been paddling 2-1/2 years and have had the Kodiak since the Winter of 200/2001. My first experience in the boat was in a pool in rolling class. I paddle it regularly on Lake Michigan off of beaches and out of harbors in Chicago. The Kodiak is a big boat for larger people. I believe that if you are less than 200lbs and have less than say a 36″ waist, you could probably fit in Prijon’s Seayak, their flagship sea kayak, and paddle it more efficiently and fit better than in the Kodiak. That said, if you ARE a bigger-heavier paddler, give the Kodiak a try.
The first thing I want to mention is how great the material is for a plastic boat. The blow molded manufacturing process really does yield a more dense, stiffer, thinner and lighter hull. The Kodiak, at 58lbs, is one of the lighter plastic boats of its length and only about 5 lbs heavier on average than fiberglass boats of the same length. The large keyhole cockpit is easy to get in and out of even with my 36″ inseam. The seat contour is good and the seat is comfortable for me without padding. There’s a cup holder in the seat like on typical rec boats and that has come in handy on lazy river paddles without a skirt. The back support is low, soft and comfortable and adjusts in angle easily with one hand while seated in the boat. The seat adjusts fore and aft a few inches and the thigh braces also adjust fore and aft a few inches making it easy to «fit» the cockpit. The adjustments are made using an allen key which is conveniently stored in a little socket in one of the thigh braces. All of the boat’s hardware seems to be good quality stainless steel that holds up to lots of adjustments. No deforming of any screw heads or allen sockets yet. I found the thigh braces to be just a tad aggressive for me, the edges dug into my thigh a tiny bit but they are easily removed and filed or sanded since they are solid blocks of plastic. Additional braces can be ordered from Prijon’s web site so you can have a go at reshaping them without worrying about wrecking you boat. I purchased the boat without a rudder. The footbraces are easily adjustable and generous in size but are really designed for use with a rudder. The rudder is controlled using the pedals in a gas pedal like fashion rather than sliding back and forth. If you want to get a boat with a rudder, seriously consider the Prijon boats for that feature. The cable ways and rear mounting block are stock so adding a rudder later is a no brainer. One downside to the rudder design is that it does interfere slightly with the rear carry toggle when stowed. The Kodiak has handy safety lines all the way around the perimeter laced through recessed plastic hardware that also act as places to attach additional rigging or lights or a compass. There are bow and stern mooring lines which can be reached from the cockpit to toss to someone already on the dock or to grab upon exiting the cockpit. Carry handles are sturdy plastic handles attached by a loop of nylon webbing. The webbing is short stiff enough to keep the handles from clunking on the hull while bouncing around in waves. The hatch system is nice too. Almost flush mounted thin thermoformed plastic covers over tough neoprene inner seals with 3/8″ bungee rands have kept my compartments bone dry even through lengthy self rescue classes. The thin plastic covers appear to be high impact ABS or similar material and are held down by nylon webbing with fastex buckles. The covers are captured by the webbing on one side so they don’t blow away when you take them off. Where the webbing attaches to the deck there are D rings so you can lash additional gear on top of the covers using rope, bungee or webbing. The rear hatch opening is huge and the compartment is too. Large enough to fit my cart (model name: Pop Cart) without breaking it down. The front hatch opening is much smaller but still larger than most other front hatch openings. Bulkheads are well sealed and keep water out. The Kodiak comes with stretchy netting type of rigging fore and aft of the cockpit. I found the netting a little difficult to quickly get things in and out of so I removed it and replaced it with the typical bungee deck rigging laced through pad eyes (inchworm eyelets) that I mounted with SS hardware. The flat part of the deck around the coaming resolves in an upward scoop toward the rear deck. While it’s not likely that this contour was designed to do so, I find it helps steady the paddle during a paddle float re-entry which I’ve begun practicing without rigging the paddle to the rear deck. The coaming on the Kodiak could be taller and deeper. The Wildwasser skirts made from Prijon stay on just fine but I’ve had trouble with a couple other brands with heavier rands slipping off. Luckily the Wildwasser skirts are very nice skirts so this is only a minor negative. A more serious negative is the undesireable flexibility of the deck next to the right thigh brace. The boat could be stiffer there. I think my boat might be an exception in this case as the left side seems plenty stiff.
The boat paddles very nicely and is very easy to keep on track. The trihedral hull does what it is supposed to. Getting this boat up on edge is easy without going over too far and once on edge it stays there until you are ready to put it back. Edging to stay on track and turn the boat is not difficult and works well. Turning without some edging is a chore. This boat has little or no rocker when flat in the water and was designed to go straight. Initial stability may seem to suffer a small amount from this trihedral hull design but I have never felt uneasy in it. It’s fast. Keeping up with more experienced paddlers in glass boats is no problem. Recently I paddled with 5 experienced paddlers all in glass boats on Lake Michigan in 3 foot waves plus serious powerboat wake and I could see in their eyes that they were surprised that I was staying on course and at one time was leading. One of these guys didn’t want me to go due to my lack of experience but the boat and I together were up to the task. I would not have tried to go out that day without the others and I was impressed by the performance of the boat and proud of myself as well. The lack of an upswept bow does not seem to hinder the boats ability to ride over such waves. Weather cocking is noticeable in stronger tail winds but edging a little combined with one or two corrective sweep strokes keeps in on track but does slow me down a bit. I have not successfully rolled this boat (or any other for that matter) but have seen other class members do it successfully in pool sessions learning the C to C roll so I’m not giving up!!! Also, it’s a very handsome vessel. Since I don’t have even a full season in this boat and I’m not ready to take it out in really challenging water, and there are some things that could be improved I can’t give her a 9 or 10 just yet.
I paddled the Kodiak during a day-long fundamentals clinic on Lake Michigan. Conditions were good, with gusts up to 10 knots and 3 to 5 foot swells, with poweryacht wakes causing some chop. I chose the Kodiak specifically because based on specs only, I was interested in buying one. Other boats in the fundamentals class included several types of Perceptions, a Prijon Seayak and an Old Town something-or-other. The Kodiak is heavy at close to 60 lbs and the 75 yard carry to the waterline was no joy. I found the cockpit to be quite comfortable (I’m 5’10», 200 lbs.) although the thigh brace extensions had considerable flex that was somewhat unnerving during certain manuevers. The foot peg system is great, and adjustment is easy if you keep the sand out of the mechanism. Initial stability is moderate at best for such a fat boat, and secondary stability, while adequate, was disappointing because I had bought into all the Prijon hype about the «trihedral» hull design. Of particular note is that the Kodiaks both dumped during sculling manuevers in 4′ waves, and none of the other boats did. According to the instructors, this was a very common occurance and they normaly don’t use the Kodiaks any longer but they were short on boats due to an expedition they had going on at the same time. in a straight line, the Kodiak was fast, although it took some work to get it to speed. A Perception Shadow in the hands of a reasonably experienced paddler was the only other (plastic) boat that could keep up with the Kodiak. It also tracked extremely well, with minimal weathercocking. Turns, however, were a chore, with the boat responding slowly to edging and many sweep strokes required. The Kodiaks were among the slowest boats on the impromptu «slalom» course we set up. Although we didn’t try it during this class, the instructors told me that the Kodiak was an easy boat to eskimo roll. The Kodiak has an impressive amount of stowage, and it might be that stability would improve under a greater load.
To summarize, in my opinion the Kodiak is a fast, comfortable boat with good tracking ability and the capability to carry an expedition size load. On the down side, both initial and secondary stability are at best moderate for such a beamy boat, and turning ability is only fair. This certainly isn’t the worst of the boats I’ve paddled recently, but after my day-long tryout I’ve decided not to purchase one
I tried this boat as part of taking the Basic Kayaking Course from California Canoe and Kayak. It was a bit heavy to lift on top of the car rack, but I expected that for a 17′ boat. It is very nicely outfitted with Peg pedals, flush fore and aft hatches, perimeter rigging and cargo nets which are substantial enough to hold a paddle for a paddle float entance. The plastic seems quite durable, and the rudder system was very well done. The seat was comfortable and the adjustable thigh braces were a nice touch.
When I entered the water I immediately noted that it tracked very well and was exceptionally swift. It seemed that I could almost relax between strokes because it cut through the water very rapidly. This is a fast boat. I felt that it was very good in the primary stability department, and acceptable in secondary stability. It did not turn on as short a radius as the shorter kayaks paddled by the other classmembers, but in the open water they could not keep up with the Kodiak. During a water entrance using the paddle float, the netting was strong enough to secure the paddle during the entry. I really like this boat, because it is reasonably stable, tracks well, and paddles effortlessly. The hatches are exceptionally roomy, and will hold tons of gear. It looks good, and has nice detail. The only draback is that it is a bit heavy at 58 lbs, but considering that it is 17’1″ long, this is to be expected.
I purchased this boat and am just as happy as when I first demonstarted it. It is very durable, continues to track better than most, even without the rudder in the water. The hatches keep the interior contents dry. I found that a spray skirt with a zippered pouch makes most essentials accessible. This kayak does very well in rough water, and it was not substantially affected by winds. The 24.5″ width did not seem to make this kayak any more tippy than others of the same width. I would give this kayak a rating of 9.5 out of 10.
I’m a big guy — 6’4″, 275 lb. Had a chance to try several boats side-by-side at a Paddlefest. I’m still a novice paddler. The Kodiak is not a boat I had been looking at, since it’s not specifically built for us XXL types. The cockpit opening was barely wide enough for me to get into, and the seat pinched my hip bones. Those were the bad points. In the water, the boat is wonderful! It’s a bit «tippy» in initial stability, but the secondary stability is solid. It responds well to edging, and is quite fast — especially for a plastic boat. It seemed as fast as some of the fiberglass ones I tried. The cockpit has room for a lot of modifications — the thigh braces are adjustable, and there is a thick plastic rim and «hip brace» on the sides of the cockpit that could be carved to facilitate a bigger body. The seat, however, will never fit me — I’m too wide across the hip bones. However, the seat can be removed & replaced with something wider. For someone with even slightly narrower hips than I, this would be a great boat off-the-shelf. I may buy one and modify it.
I test paddled A Prijon Kodiak earlier this spring and came away liking this boat quite alot. Once I got the foot pegs properly positioned and the fore-aft seat positioned, the Kodiak was very accomodating and comfortable. Initial stability was (to me) not the greatest, but secondary stability was excellent. The Kodiak moves through the water like a knife. Prijon has a very VERY tough plastic that is extremely stiff. I sat on the deck behind the cockpit and it barely flexed with my 200# weight. Entering this boat was a bit tricky, especially for a 6’3 tall guy, but anyone shorter would have no difficulty. The seat back got in the way when entering, but otherwise the cockpit is roomy and leg room adequate. My boat was bright yellow and could be seen a mile away. The footpedal/rudder system is easy to use and deploy, but the Kodiak handles very well without the rudder. What I found most odd about this boat was that you never felt the seat back at all. You sat in the seat bottom and never came in contact with the seat back (maybe it was improperly fitted to me?) This boat has cavernous cargo holds front and rear, with generous openings and new flush mounted hatch covers, a nice touch I thought. And for such a long boat, the Kodiak turns and stops quite well. The Kodiak is also (in my opinion) a better looking boat than the Seayak or any of the other Prijon boats. The extra 6 inches in length over the Seayak will benefit larger/taller paddlers. And the moveable seat is a very big plus. I would have rated this boat a 10, except for the slight difficulty I had in entering the cockpit. Otherwise, this is an excellent touring kayak for beginners to advanced kayakers.
Немецкие байдарки и каяки prijon: история компании |
Антон
Прийон (Anton Prijon)
родился в 1929 году в городе Görtz, который тогда был территорией Италии. Еще подростком
он создал свою собственную байдарку и весло, и при их помощи выиграл свои
первые соревнования по гребному слалому.
В 1957
году он переехал в Розенхейм и устроился работать на фабрику Klepper, производящую
байдарки. В 1958 году Тони выиграл чемпионат Германии по гребному слалому, а в
1959 году стал чемпионом мира.
В 1962
году он основывает компанию Toni Prijon Sportwerkstätte, где производит легендарные
деревянные весла. Его упорство и мастерство вскоре создают ему имя в мире байдарочного
спорта. В это время заканчивается эра разборных байдарок и Тони начинает вручную
производить лучшие немецкие байдарки для слалома и гребли. Он работает целыми
днями по будням, и продает свои байдарки на реках по выходным.
Талант изобретателя и конструктора позволяет Тони создавать по 2-3 модели каяков Prijon
каждый год. Комбинация мастерства и практического опыта делают его
байдарки особенными. Тестирование этих байдарок проходит на самых сложных для
прохождения реках и в самых суровых климатических условиях.
В 1981 году Тони видит преимущество неизвестной до этого технологии в производстве
байдарок – выдувании их из полиэтилена. Первый каяк Prijon — Taifun, произведенный по этой технологии, производит революцию на рынке. Спустя несколько лет байдарка Hurricane закладывает
основу современного родео.
В 1987 году Тони Прийон младший
завоевывает титул Чемпиона Мира в гребном слаломе, а с 1994 года он сменяет
отца на посту руководителя компании Prijon.
В 2007 году Тони Прийон старший как
один из пионеров байдарочного спорта был включен в «Международный зал славы
гребного слалома». Мало кто может сравниться с ним по вкладу в байдарочный
спорт. За 45 лет карьеры им было предложено множество оригинальных инженерных
решений используемых в байдарках, веслах и аксессуарах, которые сейчас
воспринимаются как само собой разумеющиеся
На сегодняшний день все байдарки Prijon, а также бОльшая часть оборудования производится
в Германии. Такое оборудование как весла, юбки и мешки производятся на
территории Европейского Союза партнерами Prijon. Тесное длительное сотрудничество со всеми поставщиками обеспечивает
непревзойденное качество продукции компании и позволяет экспортировать байдарки
практически во все страны мира.
Как и
любая другая немецкая продукция байдарки из Германии отличаются от продукции конкурентов
высокими техническими характеристиками, современным дизайном, а также отличным
качеством.
Туринговый каяк prijon yukon expedition. 2021 — 2021. —
Характеристики: Длина 440 см, ширина 61 см, вес 27 кг, объём 460 л. Носовой грузовой отсек 60 л, кормовой грузовой отсек – 110 л.
Позиционировался производителем как особо прочный экспедиционный каяк пригодный для бурной воды и моря. Производитель в своём каталоге за 2009-й год характеристики каждой из своей лодки давал по пятибалльной шкале. Для Yukon Expedition характеристики по этой пятибалльной шкале выглядели следующим образом:
- Устойчивость на курсе (tracking) — 3
- Маневренность (maneuverability) — 5
- Остойчивость (stability) — 5
- Скорость — 2
Т.е. по заявлению производителя лодка сверхманевренная и адски остойчивая, но тихоходная.
На данный момент каяк снят с производства.
История покупки.
С 2007-го по 2009-й включительно я увлекался умеренно-порожистыми карельскими речками типа Калги и Керети. А также обожал после сплава совершить небольшой морской переход по Белому морю. В этот период я эксплуатировал каркасную байдарку «Свирь» (с поддувными бортами). И как-то случайно по телевизору я увидел дурацкий американский фильм, в котором главные герои плавают по морю на совершенно неведомых для меня лодках. Как я потом узнал – это были обычные морские каяки. Но они были неразборные! Прежде всего меня поразило, что эти каяки были большими с огромными грузовыми отсеками. А я тогда думал, что неразборные каяки могут быть только крошечными сплавными или слаломными. А ещё меня поразило оборудование этих лодок: нормальные сиденья, рули, крышки для грузовых отсеков. Всё это радикально контрастировало с моей всё ещё любимой на тот момент «Свирью». Я стал интересоваться таким лодками. Оказалось, что неразборные каяки бывают абсолютно любыми: и одноместные, и двухместные, и трёх. Спортивные, туристические, речные, морские. И тогда мне приспичило!!! Хочу такую! Крутую, комфортабельную, прочную.
Сначала хотел полный аналог «Свири». Но двухместную лодку уже не хотелось, хотелось свободы! Нужна была лодка для возможности сплава по речкам, а также с возможностью ходить по морю, при этом должно быть место для снаряжения и продуктов как минимум на две недели. Рассматривал такие универсальные лодки как Prijon Combi, Dagger Axis 12, Liquid Logic Remix XP9. Но они хоть и позиционировались, как пригодные для открытой воды, но лично я ни одну из них на море представить не мог. Тот же Liquid Logic Remix XP – ничего морского в нём даже близко нету. В итоге выбор пал на Prijon Yukon Expedition.
Перед покупкой я читал отзывы пользователей об этой лодке. Отзывов на сайте paddling.net оказалось огромное количество. Причём первые отзывы были написаны ещё в 1999-м году. Почти все отзывы были восторженные, но обращало на себя внимание то, что для многих пользователей это был первый каяк.
В не разборных лодках очень смущали вопросы хранения и транспортировки. Многие мои походные товарищи открытым текстом отговаривали от совершения такой «ошибки». Говорили, что не разборные лодки это не для нашей жизни, это просто красивые игрушки для буржуйских стран с хорошей инфраструктурой, а в нашей стране только каркасные, а ещё лучше надувные. При этом в 2021-м году в рунете было крайне мало информации об эксплуатации больших не разборных каяков. Но было много статей, посвящённых проблемам отправки сплавных каяков багажными вагонами РЖД.
Тем не менее весной 2021 мы с другом заказали себе по такой лодке, и нам их привезли из Финляндии. Мне красную, Костику — жёлтую. Стоили эти лодки в 2021-м году 980 Евро за штуку.
Остальные наши походные товарищи дружно покрутили пальцем у виска.
Общие впечатления.
Конструктивно лодка очень простая. В ней всего две герметичные перегородки (в морских каяках обычно три) из мягкого пористого материала. Ручки для переноски сделаны на бурноводный манер (по типу дверной ручки). Грузовые люки закрываются неопреновыми заглушками, а поверх них фиксируются жёсткие пластиковые крышки. Сделана подготовка к установке руля (соответствующие педали, трубочки для проводки, кронштейн на корме). Днище совсем не морское и состоит из трёх плоских поверхностей.
Несмотря на то, что лодки были произведены в Германии, определённый уровень брака всё же имелся. По крайне мере в моей лодке. Например, в сиденье отверстия под болты, которыми оно крепилось к корпусу лодки, были просверлены не строго вертикально, а под небольшим углом. Из-за этого сиденье оказалось смещённым в сторону примерно на 1-2 см. А если пустую лодку поставить на воду, то она плавала со значительным креном на одну сторону. Природа кренения лодки на одну сторону мне до сих пор не понятна, т.к. никаких дефектов корпуса я не нашёл, но смещение сиденья в другую сторону мне показалось умышленным, дабы парировать эту несимметричность.
На красной лодке очень видны царапины. В итоге после трёх сезонов красный Юкон выглядел основательно потрёпанным, а жёлтый даже сейчас (после семи сезонов) выглядит очень прилично.
Плюсы.
- Действительно универсальная лодка. Идеально подходит для сплава по бурным речкам «байдарочного» уровня. При этом абсолютно адекватное поведение на море (при наличии руля).
- Уникальный полиэтилен, который не боится ничего! В отличие от полиэтиленовых лодок других производителей, корпус Юкона (как и всех лодок Prijon) формируется не вращением расплавленной заготовки, а её надуванием, именно это обуславливает неубиваемость Приёнов.
- Невероятная остойчивость! Лодка ни при каких обстоятельствах не киляется! Остойчивость многократно возрастает в гружёном состоянии.
- Благодаря высокой и круглой деке лодка хорошо эскимосится, а в гружёном состоянии эскимосится ещё лучше!
- Огромные грузовые отсеки! Носовой грузовой отсек – 60 л, задний – 110 л. При этом в кокпит дополнительно хорошо убираются два полностью загруженных баула по 45 л каждый. Один перед педалями, другой за спинкой.
- Регулируемое кресло: можно двигать вперёд и назад, менять угол наклона спинки.
- Отсутствуют места потенциальных протечек.
- Очень качественный аутфиттинг. Всё очень прочное, при этом всё легко разбирается и вновь собирается. Это свойственно всем лодкам фирмы Prijon, и этого очень не хватает многим другим производителям.
- Вопреки нашим ожиданиям лодка оказалась очень ликвидной на вторичном рынке, т.к. примерно такие пользуются спросами в туристических фирмах, организующих сплавы по речкам и туры по морю.
Минусы.
Почти все минусы являются следствием универсальности.
- Не очень высокая по бурноводным меркам маневренность в гружёном виде, примерно на уровне байдарки «Вьюн». Со специализированными сплавными каяками вообще никакого сравнения.
- Не очень высокая по морским меркам скорость. Тоже примерно на уровне байдарок типа «Свирь» и «Вьюн». В группе с морскими каяками потребует дополнительных сил, если группа вдруг начнёт очень быстро грести.
- На море даже при небольшой встречной волне нос зарывается и обдаёт гребца брызгами.
- Лодка очень сильно парусит и при боковом ветре быстро становится не управляемой. Так же лодка становится трудноуправляемой на попутной волне. Установка руля полностью решает эти проблемы.
- С морской точки зрения аутфиттинг слишком бедный: нет маленького грузового отсека сразу после кокпита, нет резинок для крепления на деке запасного весла и других мелочей, нет фиксатора для руля в поднятом положении.
- Также с морской точки зрения лодка выглядит немного уродливой.
- Со временем утомили грузовые люки, т.к. задраивать их в два этапа (сначала неопрен, потом пластиковая крышка) надоело, особенно зная, как просто устроены эти люки на морских каяках.
- Была одна поломка. Начала отклеиваться перегородка в заднем грузовом отсеке со стороны отсека. Предполагаю, что слишком сильно я туда пихал шмотки. Герметичность нарушена не была. Залил герметиком, который рекомендует производитель.
Бурноводный поход. Тулемайоки, май 2021.
Это был первый поход для наших Юконов. Вместе с нами в поход тогда поехали две двухместные каркасные байдарки, а также один сплавной каркасный каяк. Душераздирающую проблему перевозки такого большого каяка в плацкартном вагоне удалось решить очень просто: я заказал микроавтобус с багажником на крыше. Вышло дешевле, чем на поезде. Каркасные байдарки мы тоже решили тогда везти в собранном состоянии (что было ошибкой, т.к. за время пути их оболочки протёрлись в некоторых местах до дыр).
Первые впечатления от каяка в походе были просто космическими!!! Приехать в поход с уже полностью готовой к употреблению лодкой – невероятно! В течении всего похода меня переполняло чувство уверенности и защищённости: ведь дырки в оболочке и повреждения каркаса меня уже не касались. Я даже, в отличие от своих «каркасных» спутников, после ходового дня не переворачивал лодку и не обследовал днище. Там гарантировано всё было в порядке!
Ездовые качества Юкона оставили двоякое впечатление. Несмотря на то, что производитель позиционировал Юкон как сверхманевренную лодку, мне сразу показалось, что как раз именно маневренности ей отчаянно не хватало! Хотя маневренность понятие субъективное, и на впечатление сильно влияет предыдущая лодка. А предыдущей лодкой в данном случае являлся слаломный каяк, на котором я усердно тренировался в бассейне всю зиму. По сравнению с ним Юкон мне показался унылым бревном. Но я быстро заметил, что на маневренность сильно влияет наличие и распределение груза. В последствии я старался все самые тяжёлые предметы упаковывать в баулы и класть в кокпит поближе к центру. Как потом мы выяснили в одном из последующих походов (специально провели эксперимент), маневренность гружёного Юкона была примерно равна маневренности гружёной двуместной байдарки «Вьюн», при этом «Вьюн» крутился всё же чуть быстрее. И всё же повторюсь, что маневренность понятие очень субъективное. Спустя три сезона, когда я на замену своему Юкону уже купил адски устойчивый на курсе Seayak 520 HV и относительно много на нём поездил, то сев в Юкон ощутил себя буквально в родейном тазике.
В первых же порогах поразила остойчивость Юкона. Он был значительно более узким, чем «Свирь», при этом казался очень валким, я даже за весь поход ни разу не решился воспользоваться фотоаппаратом, потому что боялся его достать из-за спины. Однако, когда в одном из порогов меня сбоку ударило валом, то лодку не подкусило, как это обычно бывало с широкой «Свирью», а просто отбросило в сторону как мячик. В течение всех последующих походов я всё больше и больше восхищался чудовищной остойчивости этой лодки.
Бурноводный поход. Река Писта, июнь 2021.
Самым сложным для меня в этом походе была доставка наших Юконов на маршрут. Сам маршрут крайне популярный и абсолютно типовой, и типовая заброска на маршрут согласно ЛЮБОЙ лоции и отчёту предполагает поездку на поезде до станции Лоухи, а потом оттуда на автомобилях местных перевозчиков непосредственно на речку. Выброска аналогичная, только до другой станции. Стоит ли говорить, что ВСЕ лоции предполагают сплав либо на разборных судах (каркасные или надувные байдарки, катамараны), либо на маленьких сплавных каяках, которые можно отправить до нужной станции багажным вагоном, или даже провести с собой в вагоне как ручную кладь. С каяком длинною 4.4 м ни один такой вариант не проходит. В багажное отделение не принимают ничего длиннее 3.5 м. Я долго искал транспортные компании, которые могли бы привезти мою лодку на станцию Лоухи, но ни одна из них не гарантировала доставку точно к прибытию поезда, либо это было по цене, примерно равно цене самой лодки. Тогда я решился заказать микроавтобус с багажником на крыше прямо из Питера и до места старта в Северной Карелии. Кроме двух неразборных Юконов с нами ещё ехали две каркасные байдарки и два одноместных каяка (полиэтиленовый и каркасный). Заброска на микроавтобусе никому, кроме двух владельцев Юконов, не требовалась. К тому же заброска на микроавтобусе получилась хоть и незначительно, но дороже традиционной. Я очень боялся, что группа поднимет бунт и откажется ради двух Юконов 20 часов трястись в микрике, да ещё платить за это больше. Но всё обошлось.
Во время поездки на микроавтобусе водитель всё время боялся, что лодки во время движения куда-то улетят. Поэтому при каждом удобном случае подтягивал стропу, которой крепился мой Юкон к багажнику. Причём подтягивал только одну стропу, располагающуюся над его водительской дверью. Видимо от этого ему как-то становилось спокойнее на душе. Пришлось самому эту стропу немного ослабить, а водителя попросить больше её не подтягивать. В дальнейшем я не раз замечал, что водители, услугами которых мы пользовались в последующие годы, всегда стараются затянуть груз как можно туже. И за этим нам постоянно приходилось следить, иначе в поход можно было приехать с раздавленными лодками.
На самой речке Юкон себя показал с самой лучшей стороны. Уровень воды нам достался очень высокий, и там где в лоции указывалось «без осмотра прямо по струе» мы встречали громадные валы и сильные прижимы, на которых переворачивались даже опытные байдарочные экипажи. Как мы потом решили, при такой воде речка выросла примерно на одну категорию. Адская остойчивость Юкона буквально хранила не очень опытных гребцов. Причём чем сильнее загружена лодка, тем выше остойчивость.
Но один раз я всё-таки перевернулся. Помню, что сразу принял решение отстреливаться, но из-под воды на фоне неба увидел своё весло, которое каким-то образом уже оказалось в исходном положении для вставания. И я решил попробовать, сделал чрезвычайно корявый эскимос и уже приготовился упасть обратно. Однако к моему удивлению, Юкон продолжил вставать сам и ещё меня выдернул из воды. Вот так сработала высокая и круглая дека.
Белое море. Август 2021.
Это был первый морской поход для Юконов. А также первый чисто морской поход для меня, т.е. без речной части. Отчёт можно почитать здесь.
Участников в этом походе было только два, и оба на Юконах. Мы решили просто поехать в поход на собственном автомобиле с лодками на крыше. Позже именно такой способ заброски стал для нас самым любимым.
В течение всего походы мы буквально наслаждались Юконами. Ещё в прошлом году мы плавали по морю на каркасных байдарках, а теперь вот на полиэтиленовых каяках. Очень нравилось, что полиэтиленовую лодку можно без какого-либо ущерба таскать волоком по камням. Опять я восхищался остойчивостью Юкона. На «Свири» даже на небольшой боковой волне лодку иногда болтало достаточно сильно, а особенно неприятно было, когда волна попадала в такт раскачке лодки. С узким Юконом ничего подобного не наблюдалось. На боковой волне он просто поднимался и опускался без значительного крена. А вот боковой ветер нас измучил. Лодка безвольно разворачивала свой нос против ветра и ничего этому мы противопоставить не могли. Стремление лодки развернуться при боковом ветре было столь значительно, что это буквально деморализовывало. Рулей у нас к тому моменту куплено не было. Мы тогда считали, что руль это удел чайников, что он нужен только тем, кто не умеет грести. Но боковой ветер от нашей самоуверенности не оставил и следа. Руль однозначно надо будет купить!
Бурноводный поход. Река Видлица, май 2021.
По заброске и выброске всё опять получилось очень просто. Туда и обратно был заказан микроавтобус. Тот же самый, что у нас был в прошлом году на Писте.
Этот поход запомнился тем, что мы с Костиком на Юконах настолько осмелели и уверовали в их неубиваемость и непереворачиваемость, что все пороги проходили сходу без осмотра, из-за чего наши «каркасные» товарищи вполне заслуженно на нас наорали, т.к. они идти всё без осмотра были не готовы.
Баренцево море в районе Киркенеса. Июнь 2021.
Это был наш первый поход на территории иностранного государства. Впечатлений – море! Заброска — на своём авто. Маршрут почти кольцевой. Отчёт об этом походе здесь.
В этом походе мы впервые опробовали рули, которые были куплены после наших мучений в предыдущем морском походе.
Эффективность руля буквально шокировала. Больше не нужно было думать ни о боковом ветре, ни о воздействии волн. С рулём всё это просто перестало существовать – гребёшь себе абы как, и незаметно для себя корректируешь курс педалями. Очень быстро выработался рефлекс, при котором даже при поднятом руле пытаешься нажимать на педали забыв о весле. При этом активному маневрированию руль мешает, т.к. с помощью весла лодку можно развернуть гораздо резче.
Река Умба, Белое море, август 2021.
Этот поход был самым серьёзным испытанием как для моего Юкона, так и для меня. Маршрут включал в себя сплав по речке Умба и морской переход от устья речки до Кандалакши. Отчёт.
В этом походе из неразборных лодок был только мой Юкон, остальные суда – двухместные каркасные байдарки.
При проектировании заброски и выброски мне очень повезло, что в аккурат как в начале маршрута в Апатитах, так и в конце маршрута в Кандалакше находились терминалы грузовой компании “Севертранс”. Поэтому свой Юкон я из Питера перед походом отправил в Апатиты. А там нас с поезда встретил местный перевозчик на буханке, и по дороге на речку мы заехали в терминал и получили мою лодку. Т.е. заброска на маршрут вполне соответствовала эталону, описанному во всех лоциях, и права моих «каркасных» товарищей нарушены не были.
Если на этапе подготовки похода, а также во время самого похода мы иногда спорили о том, что лучше: каркасная байдарка или неразборный каяк, то первые часы похода однозначно являлись моим триумфом, т.к. мои спутники очень увлечённо в самых разных позах собирали свои лодки, покрыв равномерным слоем запчастей всю поляну.
Я же слонялся без дела, а потом сел в Юкон и сплавал вверх по течению до озера Умбозеро.
Уровень воды в речке был по нашим оценкам примерно на 1 м ниже, чем обычно, но тем не менее нам и оставшегося уровня хватило, что бы запомнить эту речку надолго.
Первый серьёзный, а также самый красивый и самый сложный на реке порог Падун заставил нас всех понервничать. Пока мы стояли в очереди на прохождение этого порога, то наблюдали, как это делают другие группы. На первой ступени после слива при нас кильнулись почти все байдарки и каяки других групп за исключением парочки надувнух. Уверенно его проходили только катамараны. Усиливало впечатление от порога огромное количество разбросанных обломков байдарок по берегу и примыкающему лесу, а также несколько памятников погибшим туристам. При этом последние погибшие туристы были на катамаране. Мы всей группой первую ступень этого порога обнесли. Кроме Юкона. Я решил попробовать и первую ступень прошёл вполне уверенно, спасибо адской остойчивости.
А вот последующие ступени порога мне почему-то захотелось “по умному” обойти по канализации, где меня встретила очень мощная струя и огромное количество острых камней. Я быстро застрял на камнях, меня развернуло к течению лагом, прижало к подводным камням, повалило на бок и притопило по самую грудь. В таком виде я сидел в лодке минут 20 не зная, что мне делать. Дека была под водой, в юбку била струя и сильно вогнула её внутрь. Крен у лодки был градусов 40 на струю. С очень большим трудом, опираясь руками на подводные камни я сумел в очень варварской манере (по отношению к лодке) перевалить лодку через острый камень и освободить себя. Как только я вновь поплыл, то обратил внимание, что лодка стала другой. На струе нос и корму загнуло немножко вниз. Но буквально за несколько минут она распрямилась и стала прежней. Также на днище от чрезвычайно острого камня осталась глубокая царапина, а также вмятина, которая так и не распрямилась. Если бы я попал в такую переделку на каркасной байдарке, то, несомненно, шкура была бы разорвана в клочья, а каркас был бы изуродован. Ещё приятно было то, что после 20 минут сидения в струе почти под водой, в лодку не просочилось ни капли! Ни в один из грузовых люков, ни в кокпит!
После Падуна все остальные пороги на этой речки уже не казались страшными, хотя первые ступени нескольких порогов каркасники обнесли. Был один оверкиль. Юкон мне позволил пройти абсолютно все пороги благодаря своей остойчивости.
На одном из озёр мы попали в чувствительный боковой ветер. Всех разворачивало, всем было тяжело. Но, по-моему, тяжелее всех было мне. Я в принципе не мог плыть в нужном мне направлении из-за разворачивающего действия ветра. Пришлось кое-как причалить и поставить руль. Руль полностью решил проблему.
На морской части маршрута со мной случилась пара казусов. Уже в конце маршрута мы шли с очень сильным попутным ветром и попутной волной. Как известно попутная волна упорно норовит развернуть лодку лагом. Но при наличии руля на это абсолютно не обращаешь внимания, так как чисто машинально орудуешь педалями и даже не думаешь о необходимости постоянной коррекции курса. И вот в какой-то момент картинка передо мной резко изменилась: исчез берег, вдоль которого мы плыли, а ребята, которые плыли позади меня, каким-то чудесным образом стали пересекать мой курс передо мной. Оказалось, что на одной из особо настырных волн руль на какое-то мгновение вышел из воды, и этого оказалось достаточно, что бы Юкон резко развернулся на 90 градусов полностью на несколько секунд дезориентировав меня.
Второй казус случился уже буквально в последние два часа маршрута. Дул чувствительный встречный ветер. Всем было тяжело, но я в течение некоторого времени уверенно обогнал своих спутников и стал уходить в отрыв. Однако вскоре ситуация изменилась. Байдарки меня догнали и обогнали, а я стал катастрофически отставать и вскоре вообще остался один. Мои спутники превратились в цветные точки. При этом у меня сильно заболели запястья, из-за чего сильно грести я уже не мог. Тут всему виною оказалось весло, которое я самонадеянно купил с увеличенными лопастями и длинной шафта чуть больше, чем мне надо. Думал, что с таким веслом я буду ездить быстрее. Частично так оно и оказалось, т.к. весло было очень загребущим, но при встречном ветре усилие на весле становилось просто чудовищным, это замедляло ритм гребли, травмировало запястья. В последующих походах я ещё не раз попадал во встречный ветер с такими симптомами. В результате чего в дальнейшем стал избегать таких загребущих вёсел, стал предпочитать вёсла с маленькими лопастями.
Маршрут мы закончили в морском городе Кандалакша. Там нас встретил водитель местной туристической фирмы “Колвица Тур”, который на своей буханке отвёз нас на станцию с рюкзаками, а потом ещё мы заехали в терминал “Севертранса” и сдали там мой Юкон.
Это был мой последний речной поход. Начиная со следующего сезона я полностью переключился на морские походы.
Финляндия, май 2021.
В этом походе в наши руки впервые попал настоящий морской каяк местного производства. Корпус был композитным. Нас поразило, с какой лёгкостью он скользит по воде, при чём делает это абсолютно бесшумно и почти без волны.
Подробнее об этой поездке написано в отчёте.
Юконы по сравнению с ним казались неуклюжими портовыми буксирами.
Я попробовал нащупать свой предел в части километража. Удалось прогрести 57 км за 11 часов. Из лодки вылезал только один раз для перекуса. Наибольший дискомфорт доставляли затекавшие ноги. Поэтому каждый час я останавливался, снимал юбку и сидел в лодке с согнутыми ногами, давая им таким образом отдохнуть. Благо, что огромный размер кокпита позволят так делать.
Лофотенские острова, июнь 2021.
В этом походе кроме двух Юконов были два настоящий морских каяка: Prijon Kodiak и Hasle Expedition. На одном из них (Prijon Kodiak) мне даже пару часов удалось покататься и сравнить с Юконом. Крайне не комфортно я в Кодиаке себя почувствовал, когда мы плавали среди причалов и катеров, т.к. отчаянно не хватало маневренности для вписывания в узкие проходы между причалами. При этом у Кодиака по сравнению с Юконом была существенно меньше начальная остойчивость, это я в полной мене ощутил на попутной волне.
Так как с речками и порогами я уже завязал, то стал задумываться о покупке настоящей морской лодки. Такой, что бы волну носом не рыла, что бы аутфиттинг был морской, что бы ехала побыстрее.
Отчёт об этом походе здесь.
Белое море, август 2021.
Это для моего Юкона был последний поход. Уже однозначно принял решение, что хочу настоящую морскую лодку, а не универсальную.
Подробнее об этом походе в отчёте.
Этот поход был для меня первым сольным. Т.е. я был совсем один. В итоге каждый день утром и вечером я волоком таскал лодку по прибрежным камням, как правило гружёную. Аккуратно носить-то её было не с кем. И каждый день я мысленно слал слова благодарности разработчикам этой лодки, а точнее разработчикам материала, из которого она сделана, т.к. подобное издевательство могут выдерживать только лодки Prijon.
В этом походе пришлось помучаться с рулём. Дело в том, что сильный боковой ветер меня однажды застал на участке с густыми водорослями. Водоросли руль поднимают так, что его перо полностью выходит из воды. Такова его конструкция, что бы избежать поломки. Ну а лодка, разумеется, становилась на ветру абсолютно неуправляемой.
После этого похода Юкон был мною продан в туристическую фирму из Петрозаводска. В последствии я очень жалел о продаже, т.к. часто нам не хватало одной лодки. Но не продав Юкон я не мог себе позволить купить другую лодку.
После Юкона
За три сезона Юкон полностью меня переделал.
Юкон заставил меня полностью пересмотреть моё снаряжение. Если в первый сезон на Юконе я грёб тяжеленным алюминиевым веслом с полиэтиленовыми лопастями, а одевался в неопреоновый костюм, то уже через сезон я щеголял в сухом гидрокостюме и грёб фирменным карбоновым веслом. Но самое главное, что полностью исчезли сомнения по части транспортировкой и хранением большой неразборной лодки. В эксплуатации Юкон оказался существенно проще, чем разборная байдарка «Свирь». В качестве следующей после Юкона лодки рассматривал только неразборные каяки. Иные для меня просто перестали существовать.